Legal Opinion

Freedman v. Louisiana-Pacific Corp.

District Court, D. Oregon

Decided February 14, 1996No. Civ. 95-707-JOPublishedCited by 31 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

ROBERT E. JONES, Judge:

This action is brought by several Plaintiffs who purchased Louisiana-Pacific (“L-P”) common stock during the period from October 19, 1993 through May 24, 1995. Plaintiffs assert the following two claims: Defendants 1 allegedly violated sections 10(b), 15 U.S.C. § 78j(b), and 20(a), 15 U.S.C. § 78t(a), of the Securities Exchange Act (“Act”), as well as Rule 10b-5, 17 C.F.R. § 240.10b-5, promulgated by the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”). 2 This ease is before this Court on Defendants’ Motions to Dismiss and Strike (# 41, # 43, # 52, # 58), 3 and Plaintiffs’…

2Cases cited71 opinions

  1. General Telephone Co. of Southwest v. FalconSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
  2. Ernst & Ernst v. HochfelderSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  3. Basic Inc. v. LevinsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  4. TSC Industries, Inc. v. Northway, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  5. United States v. GaudinSupreme Court of the United States · 1995

66 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by31 opinions

  1. Betz v. Trainer Wortham & Co., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2007
  2. Craft v. Philip Morris Companies, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 2005
  3. Weikel v. Tower Semiconductor Ltd.District Court, D. New Jersey · 1998
  4. In re Cooper Companies Inc. Securities LitigationDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2009
  5. State Ex Rel. American Family Mutual Insurance Co. v. ClarkSupreme Court of Missouri · 2003

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API