Legal Opinion
Brett Andrew v. Daniel Austin Walzl
District Court, C.D. California
Decided April 23, 2020No. 2:20-cv-03423Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT CENTRAL DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA CIVIL MINUTES —- GENERAL Case No. 20-3423 AB (PVCx) Date: April 23, 2020 Title Brett Andrew v. Daniel Austin Walzl Present: The Honorable Pedro V. Castillo, United States Magistrate Judge Marlene Ramirez None Deputy Clerk Court Reporter / Recorder Attorneys Present for Petitioner: Attorneys Present for Respondent: None None PROCEEDINGS: [IN CHAMBERS] ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE MAGISTRATE JUDGE SHOULD NOT RECOMMEND THAT PETITIONER’S APPLICATION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS BE DENIED FOR LACK OF JURISDICTION (Dkt. No. 2) On April 13,…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Kokkonen v. Guardian Life Insurance Co. of AmericaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Moses H. Cone Memorial Hospital v. Mercury Construction Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Owen Equipment & Erection Co. v. KrogerSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Southland Corp. v. KeatingSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Empire Healthchoice Assurance, Inc. v. McVeighSupreme Court of the United States · 2006
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.