Legal Opinion
Hibbs v. State Farm Fire And Casualty Company
District Court, D. Oregon
Decided December 19, 2022No. 6:22-cv-00532Unknown
1Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT DISTRICT OF OREGON EUGENE DIVISION JANELL HIBBS, Case No. 6:22-cv-00532-MK OPINION AND Plaintiff, ORDER vs. STATE FARM FIRE AND CASUALTY COMPANY, Defendant. _________________________________________ KASUBHAI, United States Magistrate Judge: Plaintiff Janell Hibbs brings this action alleging claims arising from an insurance policy dispute. Compl., ECF No. 1. Defendant State Farm Fire and Casualty Company moves to strike several pleadings as inadmissible settlement communications under Fed. R. Civ. P. 408. For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s motion to strike is…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Fogerty v. Fantasy, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
- Whittlestone, Inc. v. Handi-Craft Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2010
- Fantasy, Inc. v. FogertyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- Joshua Liam Josephs, AKA Joshua Liam Joesphs, Joshua Liam Josepths v. Pacific Bell, Does, 1-30, InclusiveCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2006
- Capella Photonics, Inc. v. Cisco Systems, Inc.District Court, N.D. California · 2014
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.