Legal Opinion

Exxon Corp. v. Compton Corp. (In Re Compton Corp.)

United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Texas

Decided July 30, 1982No. 16-41054PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

JOHN C. FORD, Bankruptcy Judge.

The case at bar presents the narrow question of whether the 90 day improvement of position test found in Code section 553(b), 11 U.S.C. § 553(b), applies to a post-petition setoff. The parties have submitted the case on agreed facts and only ask that a determination be made on the narrow issue of law. Based on an analysis of the stipulated facts, arguments of counsel, briefs submitted to the Court, pleadings on file, and the applicable law, the Court is of the opinion that § 553(b) does not apply to post-petition setoffs.

On May 7,1982, an…

2Cited by11 opinions

  1. 16 Collier bankr.cas.2d 1447, Bankr. L. Rep. P 71,794 Braniff Airways, Inc. Debtor and Debtor-In-Possession, and the Official Unsecured Creditors' Committee of Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Exxon Company, U.S.A.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  2. Braniff Airways, Inc. v. Exxon Co.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1987
  3. Rooster, Inc. v. Raphael Roy, S.R.L. (In Re Rooster, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1991
  4. Sandoz v. Conoco, Inc. (In Re Delta Energy Resources, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Louisiana · 1986
  5. In Re Internal Revenue Service Liabilities & Refunds in Chapter 13 ProceedingsDistrict Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1983

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API