Legal Opinion

State v. Fogg

South Dakota Supreme Court

Decided June 27, 1962No. File 9949Published

1Opinion of the Court

115 N.W.2d 889 (1962)

STATE of South Dakota, Respondent,

v.

Alexis F. FOGG and Jesse Zimmerman, a/k/a Jesse Young, Defendants and Appellants.

No. 9949.

Supreme Court of South Dakota.

June 27, 1962.

Acie W. Matthews, Sioux Falls, for defendants and appellants.

A. C. Miller, Atty. Gen., Donald J. McClure, Asst. Atty. Gen., Pierre, William F. Clayton, State's Atty., Roger A. Schiager, Asst. State's Atty., Sioux Falls, for plaintiff and respondent.

HANSON, Judge.

Defendants were jointly charged with the crime of burglary. Both were found guilty and both appeal.

Police officers discovered a break-in at the…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. State v. McTagueSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1927
  2. State v. PierceSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1950
  3. State v. ViolettSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1961
  4. The STATE v. WorthySupreme Court of South Carolina · 1962
  5. State v. GuffeySouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1917

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API