Legal Opinion
Bernegger v. Executive Office of U.S. Attorneys
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided February 25, 2022No. Civil Action No. 2018-0908Published
1Opinion of the Court
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA PETER M. BERNEGGER, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 18-908 (RDM) EXECUTIVE OFFICE FOR UNITED STATES ATTORNEYS, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Peter M. Bernegger, proceeding pro se, brings this Freedom of Information Act (“FOIA”), 5 U.S.C. § 552, and Privacy Act, 5 U.S.C. § 552a, action against the Executive Office for United States Attorneys (“EOUSA”). See Dkt. 1. In the request underlying this action, Bernegger sought “the complete and total file” related to his prosecution and conviction for mail and bank fraud in the Northern District…
2Cases cited16 opinions
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Military Audit Project, Felice D. Cohen, Morton H. Halperin v. William Casey, Director of Central IntelligenceCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. Rossotti, CharlesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2003
- Judicial Watch, Inc. v. United States Department of JusticeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2002
- David Paul Larson v. Central Intelligence AgencyCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.