Legal Opinion
In Re Suitability of Young
Ohio Court of Appeals
Decided November 8, 1990No. 90AP-17Published
1Opinion of the Court
Reilly, Presiding Judge.
This is an R.C. 119.12 appeal from a judgment of the Franklin County Court of Common Pleas affirming an order of the Ohio Real Estate Commission. The commission found that appellants, YOU, Inc. (“YOU”) and Michael J. Young (“Young”), violated provisions of R.C. Chapter 4735 and commission rules and, thus, the commission suspended their broker’s licenses.
Appellants assert seven assignments of error, as follows:
“I. Appellee’s finding below that appellant YOU violated Section 4735.-18(A)(21) of the Ohio Revised Code is neither supported by reliable, probative, and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Keyishian v. Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NYSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Barsky v. Board of Regents of the University of the State of New YorkSupreme Court of the United States · 1954
- Angelkovski v. Buckeye Potato Chips Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Carroll v. Department of Administrative ServicesOhio Court of Appeals · 1983
- Hartzog v. Ohio State UniversityOhio Court of Appeals · 1985
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.