Legal Opinion · Dissent

Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided August 7, 1997No. WCB 94-07627; CA A89536; SC S43425Published

1DissentGraber, J.

I respectfully dissent. Although this is a close case, in my view claimant did not establish that her injury was compensable.

“The burden of proving that an injury * * * is compensable * * * is upon the worker. The worker cannot carry the burden of proving that an injury * * * is compensable merely by disproving other possible explanations of how the injury * * * occurred.” ORS 656.266.

On review, the facts are not contested. The Board accepted the parties’ stipulated facts, adopted the “notice [d] facts” found by the administrative law judge, and made its own findings.

The parties stipulated to…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
  2. Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
  3. Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
  4. Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
  5. Hill City Trucking, Inc. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API