Legal Opinion · Dissent
Fred Meyer, Inc. v. Hayes
Oregon Supreme Court
Decided August 7, 1997No. WCB 94-07627; CA A89536; SC S43425Published
1DissentGraber, J.
I respectfully dissent. Although this is a close case, in my view claimant did not establish that her injury was compensable.
“The burden of proving that an injury * * * is compensable * * * is upon the worker. The worker cannot carry the burden of proving that an injury * * * is compensable merely by disproving other possible explanations of how the injury * * * occurred.” ORS 656.266.
On review, the facts are not contested. The Board accepted the parties’ stipulated facts, adopted the “notice [d] facts” found by the administrative law judge, and made its own findings.
The parties stipulated to…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Phil A. Livesley Co. v. RussOregon Supreme Court · 1983
- Krushwitz v. McDonald's Restaurants of Oregon, Inc.Oregon Supreme Court · 1996
- Norpac Foods, Inc. v. GilmoreOregon Supreme Court · 1994
- Indian Territory Illuminating Oil Co. v. LewisSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1933
- Hill City Trucking, Inc. v. ChristianSupreme Court of Virginia · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.