Legal Opinion
United States v. Loretta Tarango
Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit
Decided January 7, 2005No. 03-50810PublishedCited by 35 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
CARL E. STEWART, Circuit Judge:
The Government appeals from the district court’s order granting Lorretta Tar-ango’s motion for a new trial. A jury found Tarango guilty of aiding and abetting her co-defendant, Dipakkumar Patel, in his efforts to defraud various federal health care programs by submitting false billing statements that failed to comply with the governing provisions of those programs. The Government contends that the district court abused its discretion by granting the motion. We disagree, and for the reasons set forth below, affirm the district court’s grant of a new trial.
FACTUAL…
2Cases cited22 opinions
- Tibbs v. FloridaSupreme Court of the United States · 1982
- Zafiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1993
- Delli Paoli v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1957
- Schaffer v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1960
- United States v. Quentin Ira LincolnCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1980
17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by35 opinions
- United States v. WhitfieldCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2009
- United States v. Benjamin Stanley, Rufus Paul HarrisCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2014
- United States v. ClarkCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2013
- United States v. Travis McCabeCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2012
- United States v. Jermaine ChapmanCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 2017
30 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.