Legal Opinion
Canterbury v. Federal-Mogul Ignition Co.
District Court, S.D. Iowa
Decided April 16, 2007No. 4:06-cr-00044PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER ON MOTIONS
PRATT, Chief Judge.
Before the Court is Defendant’s First Motion for Summary Judgment (Clerk’s No. 42), filed November 29, 2006. Plaintiff filed a resistance to the motion (Clerk’s No. 54) and Defendant replied (Clerk’s No. 56). The matter is fully submitted.
I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND
Joseph Canterbury (“Canterbury”) filed the present action on September 12, 2005, in the Iowa District Court in and for Des Moines County, Iowa. Defendant removed the matter on October 11, 2005. Jurisdiction is proper under both 28 U.S.C. § 1331 and § 1332.
Plaintiffs Complaint alleges that he commenced…
2Cases cited31 opinions
- Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
- Lujan v. Defenders of WildlifeSupreme Court of the United States · 1992
- New Hampshire v. MaineSupreme Court of the United States · 2001
- Poller v. Columbia Broadcasting System, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1962
26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Aery v. Wallace Lincoln-Mercury, LLCDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2013
- Morton v. SchlotzhauerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2016
- Barefield v. Hanover InsuranceUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Michigan · 2014
- Brown v. Anselme (In Re Polo Builders, Inc.)United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Illinois · 2007
- Larsen v. Selmet, Inc.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 2022
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.