Steineck v. Coleman
California Court of Appeal
1Opinion of the CourtConrey, P. J.
Respondent moves to dismiss the appeal from the order denying motion to vacate judgment, upon the ground that the appeal is taken solely for the purpose of delay and is frivolous. By an order made some time ago the court granted a motion of respondent to dismiss the appeal from the judgment and denied a motion made at the same time to dismiss the appeal from the order. The grounds stated for the present motion might have been suggested in connection with the former motion if respondent had elected to include them. This alone is a sufficient reason for declining to consider such motion at this…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Berri v. RogeroCalifornia Supreme Court · 1914
- Savage v. SmithCalifornia Supreme Court · 1915
- People v. WoodsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1923
3Cited by7 opinions
- Petersen v. MurphyCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1943
- Svistunoff v. SvistunoffCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1952
- River Farms Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1933
- Keele v. ClouserCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1928
- Dobbins v. HardisterCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1966
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.