Legal Opinion

Mia Townsend, Movant/Appellant v. State of Missouri

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided August 2, 2016No. ED103550PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtPhilip M. Hess, Chief Judge

Introduction

Mia Townsend (Movant) appeals the motion court’s denial, without an evidentiary hearing, of her Rule 24.035 1 amended motion for post-conviction relief. In her sole point relied on, Movant contends the motion court erred by denying her motion without an evidentiary hearing because Movant pleaded facts,' unrefuted by the record, that her plea counsel was ineffective for promising she would receive probation in exchange for making a blind 2 Alford 3 plea. We affirm.

Factual Background

In June 2012, Movant acted with her mother and co-defendant, Cheryl Moore, and her sister, Ronnica…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. North Carolina v. AlfordSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Burnett v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2009
  3. Brown v. GammonMissouri Court of Appeals · 1997
  4. Shackleford v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2001
  5. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2011

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. State of Missouri v. Robert T. ByingtonMissouri Court of Appeals · 2019
  2. State of Missouri v. Thomas J. Savage, IIIMissouri Court of Appeals · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API