Legal Opinion

Commonwealth v. Colomna

Massachusetts Appeals Court

Decided August 11, 1992No. 90-P-736PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

The defendant appeals from a conviction of trafficking in cocaine. After the appeal was entered in this court, the defendant, represented by new counsel, filed a motion in the trial court for a new trial. This was denied, and no appeal was taken from the denial. The record before us does not disclose the basis of the motion for a new trial or the reason for the denial. The appeal from the conviction is based on a claim of ineffective assistance of trial counsel. 1. The defendant faults his trial counsel for a failure to call character witnesses in support of the defendant’s claim of…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Earl v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
  2. Commonwealth v. ApplebyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1983
  3. Commonwealth v. PorterMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1980
  4. Commonwealth v. KoulourisMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
  5. Lamoureux v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Commonwealth v. LopezMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1995

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API