Commonwealth v. Porter
Massachusetts Appeals Court
1Opinion of the Court
The defendant was convicted of armed robbery after a jury trial in the Superior Court. His sole contention on this appeal is that his constitutional right to a fair trial was abridged by the ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. It appears that the constitutional claim is grounded on matters that do not appear on the face of the record and that it may involve the resolution of disputed and unsettled factual questions concerning defense counsel’s conduct at the trial. In these circumstances the judgment of conviction must be affirmed and the defendant remitted to his remedy to resolve…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Earl v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1969
- Commonwealth v. WrightMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1978
- Sayles v. CommonwealthMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1977
3Cited by12 opinions
- Superwood Corp. v. Siempelkamp Corp.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1981
- Commonwealth v. CowieMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1989
- Commonwealth v. WashingtonMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. DutraMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1983
- Commonwealth v. LeoMassachusetts Appeals Court · 1981
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.