Legal Opinion

State v. Charles

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided November 2, 1993No. 93-1990-CR-FTPublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtMyse, J.

Adam Charles appeals a judgment convicting him of operating after revocation (OAR), seventh offense, criminal, sentencing him to six months in jail and imposing a $2,460 fine under Wisconsin Stat. Ann. sec. 343.44(2g)(e), Stats. (West Supp. 1993). 2 Charles contends that the trial court erred by sentencing him for OAR, seventh offense, criminal, because his six prior OAR offenses were civil offenses. We conclude that the trial court properly sentenced Charles under the enhanced penalty provisions of sec. 343.44(2g)(e) because of Charles' intervening conviction for operating under the…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. State v. Hoa Duc PhamWisconsin Supreme Court · 1987
  2. In Interest of R.H.L. v. StateCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1990

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Reimann v. Circuit Court for Dane CountyWisconsin Supreme Court · 1997
  2. State v. WilliamsWisconsin Supreme Court · 1996
  3. State v. DismukeWisconsin Supreme Court · 2001
  4. State v. DoyenCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994
  5. State v. CroweCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1994

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API