Legal Opinion

Petition of State

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided January 27, 1992PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALSH, Justice:

The State of Delaware seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Superior Court to resentence a defendant under certain assessment standards which were not in effect when the offense was committed. The State specifically requests this Court to order the Superior Court to impose a three percent increase in the amount to be paid by the defendant, Carl E. Smith (“Smith”), to the State’s Vic tim Compensation Fund and a fifteen percent assessment to be paid to the Drug Rehabilitation Fund. The Superior Court refused to apply the provisions of the newly-enacted…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
  2. United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  3. Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
  4. Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
  5. DiStefano v. WatsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. State v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
  2. People v. SteadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
  3. Taylor v. Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
  4. Petition of StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
  5. In Re the State for a Writ of MandamusSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API