Petition of State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
WALSH, Justice:
The State of Delaware seeks the issuance of a writ of mandamus to compel the Superior Court to resentence a defendant under certain assessment standards which were not in effect when the offense was committed. The State specifically requests this Court to order the Superior Court to impose a three percent increase in the amount to be paid by the defendant, Carl E. Smith (“Smith”), to the State’s Vic tim Compensation Fund and a fifteen percent assessment to be paid to the Drug Rehabilitation Fund. The Superior Court refused to apply the provisions of the newly-enacted…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- United States v. HalperSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Will v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Harisiades v. ShaughnessySupreme Court of the United States · 1951
- DiStefano v. WatsonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1989
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by10 opinions
- State v. CohenSupreme Court of Delaware · 1992
- People v. SteadSupreme Court of Colorado · 1993
- Taylor v. Rhode IslandCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1996
- Petition of StateSupreme Court of Delaware · 1998
- In Re the State for a Writ of MandamusSupreme Court of Delaware · 2007
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.