Legal Opinion
People v. Lasek
New York County Courts
Decided June 9, 1978PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
John V. Aylward, J.
Defendants’ counsel moves pursuant to CPL 210.20 (subd 1, par [e]) to dismiss the indictments upon the ground that prosecution is barred by reason of a previous prosecution pursuant to CPL 40.20. Both defendants were charged with three offenses, namely, criminal impersonation (Penal Law, § 190.25, subd 2), petit larceny (Penal Law, § 155.25), both misdemeanors, and scheme to defraud in the first degree (Penal Law, § 190.65, subd 1), a class E felony.
*1008Defendant Lasek was 18 years of age and defendant Lunderman was 17 years old when they were arrested on…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Brown v. OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- People v. AbbamonteNew York Court of Appeals · 1977
- Abraham v. Justices of New York Supreme CourtNew York Court of Appeals · 1975
3Cited by4 opinions
- Beth Israel Medical Center v. SmithDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- People v. Lennon, New York County Courts1980
- Holtzman v. SamuelNew York Supreme Court · 1985
- People v. JonesNew York Supreme Court · 1983