Legal Opinion

Cymerys v. Zoning Board of Appeals

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided July 18, 1963PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBaldwin, C. J.

The defendant zoning board of appeals of Windsor Locks granted a variance in the application of § 8.8 (a) of the zoning ordinance of the town to certain lands owned by the defendant Alexander Jarvis and leased by him to the defendant Henry P. Carville. Section 8.8 (a) of the ordinance provides in substance that no premises shall be used for selling or exchanging alcoholic beverages, at wholesale or retail, for consumption on or off the premises, if the premises are within 2000 feet, in a direct line, from any other premises which are used for any of those purposes. The plaintiff, a nearby…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Service Realty Corporation v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  2. O'CONNOR v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
  3. Plumb v. Board of Zoning AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
  4. Finch v. MontanariSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1956
  5. Makar v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ward v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1965
  2. W A T R, Inc. v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1969
  3. Michler v. Planning & Zoning Board of AppealsConnecticut Appellate Court · 2010
  4. Lessner v. Zoning Board of AppealsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API