Legal Opinion

Meek v. Christian

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided March 23, 1925Published

1Opinion

Hart, J.,

(on rehearing). .Counsel for C. S. Christian

earnestly insist that the court erred in not allowing him interest from the date of the completion of his services: as. engineer in making the preliminary survey of the roads in the district and his" plans and estimates showing the cost of the construction of the improved roads. They strongly rely upon the case of Iron Mountain & Helena Rd. v. Stansell, 43 Ark. 275. In that ease there was a contract between the railroad 'company and 'the construction company for the construction óf defendant’s line of road from-Helena to Forrest City;-…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Altheimer v. Board of Directors of Plum Bayou Levee DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1906
  2. Iron Mountain & Helena Rail Road v. StansellSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1884
  3. Hiter v. Harahan Viaduct Improvement DistrictSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1924

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API