Legal Opinion
Berrie v. Berrie
New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division
Decided January 7, 1983PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
188 N.J. Super. 274 (1983)
457 A.2d 76
RUSSELL BERRIE, PLAINTIFF,
v.
KATHY BERRIE, DEFENDANT.
Superior Court of New Jersey, Chancery Division Bergen County.
Decided January 7, 1983.
Sidney Slauson, for plaintiff (Theodore Sager Meth of counsel and on the brief).
Sheldon Liebowitz, for defendant (Liebowitz, Liebowitz & Clarke, attorneys).
Edward J. Nowakoski, for Wallace Berrie (Kraft & Hughes, attorneys).
HAMER, J.J.D.R.C. (temporarily assigned).
The issue presented here is the extent to which a nonparty should be compelled to disclose in discovery proceedings information which the deponent considers…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Federal Trade Commission v. American Tobacco Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Premium Service Corporation v. The Sperry & Hutchinson Company, George A. ScottCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1975
- City of Carmel-By-The-Sea v. YoungCalifornia Supreme Court · 1970
- Arcell v. Ashland Chemical Co., Inc.New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1977
- Horizons Titanium Corporation v. Norton CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1961
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Trump's Castle Assoc. v. TalloneNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1994
- Catalpa Investment Group, Inc. v. Franklin TownshipNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1991
- Gensollen v. ParejaNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2010
- United States v. Federation of Physicians and Dentists, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1999
- Alternative Global One, LLC v. David FeingoldNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 2024
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.