Legal Opinion

Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided November 26, 1979No. 77-657, CA 14540PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, P. J.

The State Accident Insurance Fund appeals from a Vorkers’ Compensation Board finding that the claim-mt’s condition is compensable as an occupational disuse. SAIF contends that the claimant is not entitled o the statutory presumption of firemen’s occupational iseases and that he has not shown by a preponderance f the evidence that his disease is work related. We everse.

The claimant worked as a fireman for the City of ilamath Falls from 1967 until September, 1976, when ericardial (heart-related) and pleuritic (lung-related) ains forced him to stop working. He had undergone ledical examinations…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
  2. Wick v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
  3. Henry v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
  4. Pflughaupt v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
  2. Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
  3. Lines v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
  4. Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
  5. White v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API