Wright v. State Accident Insurance Fund
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the CourtTanzer, P. J.
The State Accident Insurance Fund appeals from a Vorkers’ Compensation Board finding that the claim-mt’s condition is compensable as an occupational disuse. SAIF contends that the claimant is not entitled o the statutory presumption of firemen’s occupational iseases and that he has not shown by a preponderance f the evidence that his disease is work related. We everse.
The claimant worked as a fireman for the City of ilamath Falls from 1967 until September, 1976, when ericardial (heart-related) and pleuritic (lung-related) ains forced him to stop working. He had undergone ledical examinations…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Weller v. Union Carbide Corp.Oregon Supreme Court · 1979
- Wick v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1978
- Henry v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1979
- Pflughaupt v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1976
3Cited by6 opinions
- Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundOregon Supreme Court · 1980
- Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1980
- Lines v. State Accident Insurance Fund Corp.Court of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
- Wright v. State Accident Insurance FundCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1985
- White v. General Motors Corp.Michigan Supreme Court · 1988
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.