Legal Opinion

Gabriel Brian Nock v. State of Florida

Supreme Court of Florida

Decided November 1, 2018No. SC17-472PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCanady, C.J.

In this case, we consider an issue regarding the rule of completeness codified in the Florida Evidence Code and a related issue concerning the rule of evidence authorizing the impeachment of hearsay declarants. This Court granted jurisdiction to review the decision of the Fourth District Court of Appeal in Nock v. State , 211 So.3d 321 (Fla. 4th DCA 2017), in which the district court certified conflict with the Second District's decision in Foster v. State , 182 So.3d 3 (Fla. 2d DCA 2015), on the latter issue. We have jurisdiction. See art. V, § 3(b)(4), Fla. Const.

Specifically, two issues…

Also in this document: Concurrence · Lewis; Concurrence · Quince.

2Cases cited40 opinions

  1. State v. DiGuilioSupreme Court of Florida · 1986
  2. Beech Aircraft Corp. v. RaineySupreme Court of the United States · 1988
  3. Ramirez v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1999
  4. United States v. Robert B. Sutton, United States of America v. Mark A. SucherCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1986
  5. Larzelere v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1996

35 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. GARY TIMOTHY KITCHINGS v. STATE OF FLORIDADistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2020
  2. William Walter Murphy III v. State of FloridaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2026

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API