Hunt v. Hadden
District Court, E.D. Michigan
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART MOTION FOR COSTS AND ATTORNEY’S FEES
DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge
The Court entered judgment in this case on October 23, 2015, finding the defen*804dants liable to the plaintiffs for statutory-conversion under Michigan Compiled Laws § 600.2919a. The plaintiffs have filed a timely motion for attorney’s fees and costs under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 54(d). They also ask the Court to award prejudgment interest. The defendants oppose the motion, asserting that an award of attorney’s fees under the statute is discretionary and the Court should…
2Cases cited26 opinions
- Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Chambers v. Nasco, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Alyeska Pipeline Service Co. v. Wilderness SocietySupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- Crawford Fitting Co. v. J. T. Gibbons, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1987
21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Autumn Wind Lending, LLC v. SiegelDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2025
- Finish Line Delta Construction Staffing, LLC v. Apex Construction SW, LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Kentucky · 2026
- Pianko v. General R.V. Center, Inc.District Court, E.D. Michigan · 2025