Seivert Et Ux. v. Powell
Oregon Supreme Court
1Opinion
On Rehearing
LATOURETTE, J.
In plaintiff’s petition for rehearing, it is first urged that, “The Court erred in holding that the plaintiffs were not entitled to the full rental provided in the lease.” No attempt is made by plaintiffs to meet or overcome the authorities cited by this court in the original opinion. On the other hand, plaintiffs’ posi*642tion is that, * * the tenant cannot even question the landlord’s title as long as the tenant remains in possession, and the Court is in no position to do it for him.”
The law denying a tenant’s right to dispute the landlord’s title is based on § 2-406,…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Galvin v. Brown & McCabeOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Treadgold v. WillardOregon Supreme Court · 1916
- Elwert v. MarleyOregon Supreme Court · 1909
- Horn v. DavisOregon Supreme Court · 1914
- Security Savings & Trust Co. v. OgdenOregon Supreme Court · 1927
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.