Legal Opinion

Morters v. Aiken & Scoptur, S.C.

Court of Appeals of Wisconsin

Decided February 14, 2006No. 2005AP703PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

WEDEMEYER, EJ.

¶ 1. Ronald W. Morters appeals, pro se, from a judgment ordering him to pay $27,943.11 in frivolous costs to Aiken & Scoptur, S.C., et al. Morters contends that the trial court erred in including in that award $17,820.02, which was incurred in the appellate proceedings of this case. Morters also contends that Aiken & Scoptur failed to mitigate its damages. Because we conclude that the trial court had no authority to make a finding that the appellate proceeding in this case was frivolous, or award costs related to the appellate proceedings without a directive from this court to…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Jandrt Ex Rel. Brueggeman v. Jerome Foods, Inc.Wisconsin Supreme Court · 1999
  2. Howell v. DenomieWisconsin Supreme Court · 2005
  3. Richland County v. State Department of Health & Social ServicesCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1988

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Quiles v. PokosCourt of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API