Legal Opinion
People v. Taylor
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided December 18, 2008PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
The court properly denied defendant’s motion to suppress statements. Following a radio run, three police officers, defendant and the complainant were all standing together on a street. Immediately after the complainant accused defendant of stealing his wallet, an officer turned to defendant and asked “What’s going on here?” Defendant replied that he was only helping the complainant to recover his wallet, which had been stolen and discarded by someone else. For several reasons, we reject *328defendant’s argument that the officer was required to give Miranda warnings before asking “What’s going on…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Berkemer v. McCartySupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Stansbury v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
- People v. YuklNew York Court of Appeals · 1969
- People v. BennettNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- People v. JohnsonNew York Court of Appeals · 1983
3Cited by11 opinions
- People v. WilliamsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. DavisAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017
- People v. GrantAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2012
- People v. CarbonaroAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- People v. SantiagoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2010
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.