Legal Opinion

Evans v. Houtz

Utah Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1920No. 3486PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from District Court, Fourth District, Utah County; A. B. Morgan, Judge. Action by David L. Evans and another against Matilda S. Houtz and another. From a judgment for plaintiffs, defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.

The complaint, in substance, alleges: That on. or about November 30, 1908, plaintiffs agreed to purchase from defendant Matilda S. Houtz certain real property in Utah county (describing same), also 68 shares of water stock; that pursuant to^ said agreement a contract was entered into, whereby plaintiff David L. Evans agreed to pay to defendant Houtz for said land and water stock the sum of $2,400, with interest at 8y2 per cent, per annum, same to be paid within 10 years, and, if not so paid, then the interest to be 10 per cent per annum; that defendant Houtz executed a warranty deed, and…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Cummings v. NielsonUtah Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Thomas v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1919
  3. Obrecht v. Neilson Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
  4. Pool v. MotterUtah Supreme Court · 1919

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Romero v. SchmidtUtah Supreme Court · 1964
  2. Lincoln Land and Development Co. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  3. Lincoln Land and Development Co. v. ThompsonUtah Supreme Court · 1971
  4. Truitt v. Patten, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1930

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API