Legal Opinion
Pool v. Motter
Utah Supreme Court
Decided November 25, 1919No. 3393PublishedCited by 5 opinions
Appeal from District Court, Fourth District, Duchesne County; A. B. Morgan, Judge. Suit by Hyrum H. Pool against Fred Motter and another. From a judgment for plaintiff, awarding him costs only, and dismissing the'complaint and cross-complaint, the plaintiff appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtWeber, J.
Plaintiff appeals from a judgment in his favor, awarding him costs only, and claims he should recover $500 and interest. The facts found by the court are as follows:
“(1) That at the time alleged in the complaint the defendants, Fred Motter and B. L,. Dart, were associated together in the business of real estate brokers under the firm name of the Pioneer Realty Company, with an ofiiee at Myton, Utah.
“(2) That on or about the 13th day of May, 1918, at Myton, Utah, the defendants agreed with plaintiff that in consideration of the sum of $1,200 they would sell to plaintiff, free from any…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Obrecht v. Neilson Land & Water Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1914
3Cited by5 opinions
- Thomas v. JohnsonUtah Supreme Court · 1919
- Thackeray v. KnightUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Munson v. Apartment & Hotel Inv. Co.Utah Supreme Court · 1923
- Evans v. HoutzUtah Supreme Court · 1920
- Truitt v. Patten, SheriffUtah Supreme Court · 1930