Legal Opinion
Soto v. Montanez
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided February 4, 1994No. Appeal No. 2PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Judgment unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Plaintiffs’ notice of appeal states that this appeal is taken from the jury verdict and various rulings of the trial court. No appeal lies from a verdict or trial rulings (see, Matter of Bello, 101 AD2d 861; see generally, Siegel, Practice Commentaries, McKinney’s Cons Laws of NY, Book 7B, CPLR C5512:1). We exercise our discretion to disregard the misstatement in the notice of appeal (see, CPLR 5520 [c]) and we deem the appeal to have been taken from the judgment (see, Hughes v Nussbaumer, Clarke & Velzy, 140 AD2d 988).
None of the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Hughes v. NussbaumerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1988
- Kuncio v. Millard Fillmore HospitalAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1986
- Gunnarson v. StateAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1983
- Soto v. MontanezAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1991
- In re the Estate of BelloAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
3Cited by8 opinions
- Heilbrunn v. Town of WoodstockAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- In re SpechtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1999
- Kolbert v. Maplewood Healthcare Center, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- Furio v. Palm Beach Club, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994
- 10 Park Square Associates, Inc. v. TravelersAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.