Legal Opinion
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co. v. Federal Power Commission
Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
Decided June 3, 1957No. 13515PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
WILBUR K. MILLER, Circuit Judge.
Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company and its subsidiary, Union Light, *689Heat and Power Company,1 are retail distributors of natural gas purchased at wholesale from Central Kentucky Natural Gas Company. They petition for review and modification of an order of the Federal Power Commission which permitted Central Kentucky and its affiliated supplier, United Fuel Gas Company, to change their demand-commodity rate form by providing for a contract demand over a long term. Under the new form, the billing demand is not to exceed, nor be less than 90 per cent of, a quantity…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Federal Power Commission v. Hope Natural Gas Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United Gas Pipe Line Co. v. Mobile Gas Service Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Eccles v. Peoples Bank of Lakewood VillageSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Federal Power Commission v. Sierra Pacific Power Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1956
- Market Street Railway Co. v. Railroad Commission of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1945
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Memphis Light, Gas & Water Division v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Utility Users League and Nickolas L. Barnes v. Federal Power Commission, Commonwealth Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968
- Memphis Light, Gas And Water Division v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- The Cincinnati Gas & Electric Company v. Federal Power CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1957
- Utility Users League and Nickolas L. Barnes v. Federal Power Commission, Commonwealth Edison Company, IntervenorCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1968