Legal Opinion

Hartman v. Lee

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 15, 1868PublishedCited by 5 opinions

APPEAL from the Montgomery Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtElliott, J.

Petition for partition by the appellees against Hartman, the appellant.

The petitioners are the heirs at law of Dorcas Lee, deceased; four of them being her children and the remaining one a grand child, who represents his deceased mother.

They claim one undivided seventh of the land described in the petition, containing in all about one-hundred and forty-three acres situate in Montgomery county, by descent from Dorcas Lee, who died prior to 1852, and who was one of the children and heirs at law of Hemy and Nancy Nich*282olson, deceased, and allege that Hartman, the appellant, Is the owner in fee-…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Voris v. State xe rel. DavisIndiana Supreme Court · 1874
  2. Blair v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1876
  3. McComas v. LongIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. McDonald v. McElroyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1882
  5. Trolan v. RogersNew York Supreme Court · 1895

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API