Legal Opinion
Scarantino v. Public School Employees' Retirement Board
Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania
Decided April 4, 2013PublishedCited by 19 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION BY
Judge LEADBETTER.
Petitioner, Ross A. Scarantino, petitions for review of the order of the Public School Employees’ Retirement Board (Board) determining that his retirement benefits are forfeited as a result of his guilty plea to a federal criminal offense. We affirm.
On April 16, 2009, the United States Attorney for the Middle District of Pennsylvania filed a criminal complaint against Petitioner, alleging that he “did knowingly, intentionally and unlawfully corruptly ac*377cept and agree to accept, thousands of dollars in cash from another person, for [his] benefit ..., intending to be…
2Cases cited37 opinions
- Robinson v. CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
- United States v. BajakajianSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Sabri v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- United States v. AguilarSupreme Court of the United States · 1995
- United States v. Sun-Diamond Growers of CaliforniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1999
32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by19 opinions
- Snyder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
- Public Employee Retirement Administration Commission v. BettencourtMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2016
- Miller v. State Employees Retirement SystemCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
- DiLacqua v. City of Philadelphia, Board of Pensions & RetirementCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Snyder v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2024
14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.