Legal Opinion
Crouchley v. Pambianchi
Supreme Court of Connecticut
Decided May 18, 1962PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtAlcorn, J.
The controlling issue before us is the jurisdiction of the trial court to entertain an appeal from the action of the defendant commissioner of motor vehicles in purporting to reinstate a certificate approving the location of a proposed gasoline station. The corrections which the plaintiffs ask to have made in the finding do not bear significantly on the issue.
On or about April 6, 1959, the defendant Pambianchi applied to the commissioner for approval of the location of a gasoline station in Ridgefield. General Statutes § 14-320. The application was accompanied by a certificate of approval…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Young v. TynanSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1961
- Bardes v. Zoning BoardSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1954
- Town of Milford v. Commissioner of Motor VehiclesSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1953
- Wright v. AldridgeSupreme Court of Alabama · 1929
- Lazarevich v. StoeckelSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1933
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Miller v. Board of EducationSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Bartlett v. City of RockvilleSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1963
- State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1974
- Crouchley v. PambianchiSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1964
- Lundy Electronics & Systems, Inc. v. Connecticut State Tax CommissionerSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.