Legal Opinion

State v. Martin

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided October 17, 1924PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Evans, J. —

I. The prosecutrix is Ada "Winters, an unmarried woman. The defendant Martin was a married man at the time of the acts complained of. The defendant Fry was not mar ried. The evidence introduced by the State’was J sufficient to establish the conspiracy, unless it be true, as contended by the defendants, that it was legally impossible for these defendants to commit the crime charged, because the defendant Fry was unmarried. The prosecution is", had under Section 5059, Code of 1897. Under this statute, we have held that two or more persons may be found guilty of conspiracy to commit…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Sparf v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  2. State v. PhillipsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1902
  3. Hanson v. KlineSupreme Court of Iowa · 1907
  4. State v. ClemensonSupreme Court of Iowa · 1904
  5. Taylor County v. StandleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1890

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. State v. DavisSupreme Court of Iowa · 1941
  2. State v. MooreSupreme Court of Iowa · 1933
  3. State v. TiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  4. State v. TiceSupreme Court of Iowa · 1964
  5. State v. LockhartSupreme Court of Iowa · 1949

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API