Pallister v. Colle
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Concurring in part, dissenting in partWedell, J.
I concur in the affirmance of the judgment on the merits if the district court had jurisdiction. I agree with what Mr. Chief Justice Dawson has ably said on the subject of the jurisdiction of the probate court. A few additional observations may be helpful.
The question presented is not whether an opponent of a will may appeal from an order admitting a will to probate. The question is when may he do so. First, it is elementary that a litigant may not invoke the jurisdiction of a court and abandon its jurisdiction before exhausting the relief that court can grant. This is doubly true where that…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- Egnatic ex rel. Egnatic v. WollardSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Foss v. WilesSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Yeager v. YeagerSupreme Court of Kansas · 1942
- Burns v. DrakeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1943
- Gustafson v. BowlingSupreme Court of Kansas · 1944
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.