Legal Opinion · Dissent

Robbins v. Vanbrackle

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided April 28, 1997No. S97A0079Published

1DissentCarley, Justice

In her will, Mary M. Vanbrackle (Testatrix) named her mother as executrix and further provided that, “in the event that [her] mother should predecease [her],” then her daughter, Joy Robbins, was to serve as executrix. At the time of Testatrix’s death, her mother was still living, but was incompetent to serve as executrix. When Testatrix’s will was offered for probate, her son, Alton Vanbrackle, objected to the appointment of Ms. Robbins as successor executrix. The probate court admitted the will to probate and appointed Mr. Vanbrackle as administrator with will annexed because a majority of…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Olmstead v. DunnSupreme Court of Georgia · 1884
  2. Comer v. Citizens & Southern National BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1935
  3. Everitt v. LaspeyreSupreme Court of Georgia · 1943
  4. Stringfellow v. HarmanSupreme Court of Georgia · 1950
  5. Bratton v. Trust Company of GeorgiaSupreme Court of Georgia · 1940

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API