Legal Opinion

Purcell Bank & Trust Co. v. Palmer

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Decided September 8, 1936No. 25838PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

The parties appear here as plaintiff in error and defendant in error in the same order as they appeared in the trial court. They will be herein referred to as plaintiff and defendant.

On Janaury 14, 1932, Roy High was the owner of a certain herd of sheep and had executed a mortgage on them to the Purcell Bank & Trust Company to secure the in-debtednesss. At the above mentioned date said bank was being liquidated by the state of Oklahoma. The sheep in question were delivered to the defendant on said date by Roy High. This was at the direction of the trustees or liquidating agent in possession…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Turner v. CrawfordSupreme Court of Kansas · 1875
  2. Bailey v. Great Western Oil Co.New Mexico Supreme Court · 1927
  3. Hart v. PolizzottoSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1930
  4. Williams v. WilliamsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1922
  5. Sliman v. MahtookLouisiana Court of Appeal · 1931

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Carte-Caldwell v. BerryhillSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1941

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API