State v. Nicholls
Utah Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
DURHAM, Chief Justice:
¶ 1 This case comes before us on appeal from the district court’s denial of a motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm.
PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
¶2 On November 10, 2003, Craig Nic-holls, (Defendant) pled guilty to and was simultaneously sentenced for the crime of aggravated murder. On December 1, 2003, Defendant, acting pro se, filed a letter and document with the district court which the court treated as a motion to withdraw a guilty plea. The court dismissed the motion stating that it had no jurisdiction pursuant to Utah Code section 77-13-6 and directed Defendant…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1995
- State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
- State v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 2005
- Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
- State v. ReyesUtah Supreme Court · 2002
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. RhinehartUtah Supreme Court · 2007
- Nicholls v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2009
- State v. TenorioCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
- State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
- State v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.