Legal Opinion

State v. Nicholls

Utah Supreme Court

Decided December 5, 2006No. 20050176PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DURHAM, Chief Justice:

¶ 1 This case comes before us on appeal from the district court’s denial of a motion to correct an illegal sentence. We affirm.

PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND

¶2 On November 10, 2003, Craig Nic-holls, (Defendant) pled guilty to and was simultaneously sentenced for the crime of aggravated murder. On December 1, 2003, Defendant, acting pro se, filed a letter and document with the district court which the court treated as a motion to withdraw a guilty plea. The court dismissed the motion stating that it had no jurisdiction pursuant to Utah Code section 77-13-6 and directed Defendant…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. BrooksUtah Supreme Court · 1995
  2. State v. FinlaysonUtah Supreme Court · 2000
  3. State v. MerrillUtah Supreme Court · 2005
  4. Beaver v. Qwest, Inc.Utah Supreme Court · 2001
  5. State v. ReyesUtah Supreme Court · 2002

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. State v. RhinehartUtah Supreme Court · 2007
  2. Nicholls v. StateUtah Supreme Court · 2009
  3. State v. TenorioCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2007
  4. State v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2013
  5. State v. NichollsCourt of Appeals of Utah · 2017

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API