Legal Opinion

Zess v. Funke

Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)

Decided April 9, 1997No. 04-96-00247CVPublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

JOHN HILL, Justice

(Assigned).

John E. Zess appeals from a summary judgment that he take nothing in his malicious prosecution case against Richard T. Funke II, C.C. Southern, Inc., P.A.M. Transport, Inc., and Central Transport, Inc. He contends in a single point of error that the trial court erred in granting the summary judgment.

We affirm because the summary judgment evidence shows as a matter of law that the appellees had probable cause in connection with the bringing of criminal charges against Zess, and, consequently, that they acted without malice in connection with the bringing of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Nixon v. Mr. Property Management Co.Texas Supreme Court · 1985
  2. Browning-Ferris Industries, Inc. v. LieckTexas Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Inman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
  4. Compton v. Calabria, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1991
  5. Coniglio v. Snyder, Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District1988

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Thrift v. Hubbard, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1998
  2. San Antonio Credit Union v. O'CONNOR, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2003
  3. Smith v. Davis, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1999
  4. King v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001
  5. King v. Graham, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)2001

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API