Legal Opinion

State v. Hogie

North Dakota Supreme Court

Decided May 16, 1988No. Crim. 870246Published

1Opinion of the Court

424 N.W.2d 630 (1988)

STATE of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellant,

v.

Robert HOGIE, Jr., Defendant and Appellee.

Crim. No. 870246.

Supreme Court of North Dakota.

May 16, 1988.

Wendy P. Schulz (argued), Jamestown, for plaintiff and appellant.

Gilje, Greenwood & Dalsted, Jamestown, for defendant and appellee; argued by John E. Greenwood.

LEVINE, Justice.

The State appeals from an oral ruling granting Robert Hogie, Jr.'s motion for judgment of acquittal. Because we hold that the judgment of acquittal is in effect a dismissal of the information, we deny Hogie's motion to dismiss the appeal. We also…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. United States v. ScottSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  2. United States v. Martin Linen Supply Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1977
  3. Sanabria v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
  4. Lee v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. State v. HoweNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API