Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Halgus Land Company v. Holt

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided April 4, 1973No. Appeal, 275Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in part

Concurring and Dissenting Opinion by

Hoffman, J.:

The appellee purchased the property of the appellant at a tax sale subsequently held to be invalid. In this appeal, we must decide whether error was committed in fixing the liabilities of the parties with regard to the property in question.

On October 16, 1964, appellee purchased the property at a tax sale for a consideration of $2500.00. Following the sale, William T. Guseman, president of the appellee-corporation, informed appellant of the purchase and advised him that he could repurchase the *105property for the same consideration pins any costs…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Putnam v. TylerSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1888
  2. Traylor v. AllentownSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1954
  3. Pennsylvania's Northern Lights Shoppers City, Inc. AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1965
  4. Aronauer AppealSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1961
  5. General Electric Co. v. City of ErieSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1933

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API