State v. Guzman
Court of Appeals of Oregon
1Opinion of the Court
NAKAMOTO, J. pro tempore
Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for one count of fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence. ORS 163.160; ORS 132.586(2).1 He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal (MJOA) based on sufficiency of the evidence to prove that he caused the victim “substantial pain” and, therefore, “physical injury,” as required for conviction under ORS 163.160(l)(a).2 Defendant argues that the jury heard no direct evidence of the degree and duration of the victim’s pain and that no rational juror could infer substantial…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
- State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013
- State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
- State v. BilsborrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
- State v. CapwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
- State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
- State v. ColpoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
- State v. HawsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
- State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.