Legal Opinion

State v. Guzman

Court of Appeals of Oregon

Decided January 27, 2016No. D132283M; A155005PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAKAMOTO, J. pro tempore

Defendant appeals from a judgment of conviction for one count of fourth-degree assault constituting domestic violence. ORS 163.160; ORS 132.586(2).1 He assigns error to the trial court’s denial of his motion for judgment of acquittal (MJOA) based on sufficiency of the evidence to prove that he caused the victim “substantial pain” and, therefore, “physical injury,” as required for conviction under ORS 163.160(l)(a).2 Defendant argues that the jury heard no direct evidence of the degree and duration of the victim’s pain and that no rational juror could infer substantial…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. State v. HallOregon Supreme Court · 1998
  2. State v. PipkinOregon Supreme Court · 2013
  3. State v. HigginsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2000
  4. State v. BilsborrowCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2009
  5. State v. CapwellCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1981

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State v. LongCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2017
  2. State v. RobertsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2018
  3. State v. ColpoCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2020
  4. State v. HawsCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2019
  5. State v. MillerCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 2021

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API