Legal Opinion

Curtis v. Hoosier Racing Tire Corp.

District Court, N.D. Ohio

Decided January 13, 2004No. 1:02CV2105PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM & ORDER

O’MALLEY, District Judge.

Plaintiffs Edward and James Curtis, who are brothers living in Ohio, bring this action against defendant Hoosier Racing Tire Corp. (“Hoosier”), an Indiana corporation. The Curtises allege in their complaint that James owns a race car, which Edward was racing at the Talladega (Alabama) Super Speedway on October 14, 2000. The Curtises further allege that their race car was outfitted with tires designed and manufactured by Hoosier. When the right front tire blew out, the car slammed into the track wall, damaging the car and injuring Edward. The Curtises…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. Celotex Corp. v. Catrett, Administratrix of the Estate of CatrettSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  3. Adickes v. S. H. Kress & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Fed. Sec. L. Rep. P 94,768 Phil A. Street and Clyde H. Street v. J.C. Bradford & CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
  5. Frito-Lay, Inc. v. Barton Willoughby, D/B/A Willoughby FarmsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1988

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Jones v. Staübli Motor Sports Division of Staübli American Corp.District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API