Bean v. Gibbens
Supreme Court of Kansas
1Opinion of the Court
The opinion of the court was delivered by
Smith, J.:
This in its inception was an action for wrongful death. The plaintiffs obtained judgment against the defendant. They then instituted garnishment proceedings against the insurance company to collect judgment. The insurance company answered it owed the defendant nothing. Plaintiffs elected to take issue on that answer. The trial court gave judgment in favor of plaintiffs and against the insurance company garnishee. The insurance company has appealed.
There is hot a great deal of dispute about the ultimate facts. The plaintiffs alleged all the…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Braly v. Commercial Casualty InsuranceSupreme Court of Kansas · 1951
- State Ex Rel. Maryland Casualty Co. v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1942
3Cited by11 opinions
- Bell v. TiltonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1983
- Lowry v. KneelandSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1962
- Francis O. Fisher and Charles S. Fisher v. Firemen's Fund Indemnity CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Meyer v. State Farm Mutual Automobile InsuranceNebraska Supreme Court · 1975
- American Casualty Company of Reading, Pennsylvania, a Corporation v. Mitzi Wypior and Herbert LiebertCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1966
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.