Legal Opinion
In re the Claim of Contro
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 2, 2000PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
—Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board, filed December 16, 1998, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because she voluntarily left her employment without good cause.
On this appeal, claimant contends that she was discharged from her employment due to lack of work. We disagree. The record indicates that claimant established a pattern of working for her husband’s plumbing business, then claiming unemployment insurance benefits for 26 weeks and then returning back to work once the benefits were…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- In re the Claim of McNeilAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
- In re the Claim of YaminianAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
- In re the Claim of PelkeyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
3Cited by5 opinions
- In re the Claim of WarnerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of MurtaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
- In re the Claim of WisinskiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
- In re the Claim of DeneyAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- In re the Claim of MurtaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001