Legal Opinion

In re the Claim of McNeil

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided February 27, 1992PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Appeal from a decision of the Unemployment *995Insurance Appeal Board, filed October 18, 1990, which, inter alia, ruled that claimant was disqualified from receiving unemployment insurance benefits because he voluntarily left his employment without good cause.

There is substantial evidence in the record to support the conclusion by the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board that there were no compelling reasons supporting claimant’s separations from employment and that his periods of unemployment were contrived by himself and his employer (see generally, Matter of Goggin [Ross], 79 AD2d 1057; Matter…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of BakerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1989
  2. In re the Claim of MullerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1975
  3. In re the Claims of NossAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1987
  4. In re the Claim of GogginAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  5. In re the Claim of PicardiAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. In re the Claim of ControAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. In re the Claim of MurtaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  3. In re the Claim of MurtaughAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API