Legal Opinion

Connor v. Ricks, Mayor

Supreme Court of Arkansas

Decided February 2, 1948No. 4-8508PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Ed. F. MoFaddin, Justice.

The question on this appeal is whether the mayor of a city — which is operating-under the Municipal Civil Service Act — has the right to appoint the chief of police of such city.

The Arkansas Legislature, by Act 28 of 1933, * enacted a comprehensive civil service law affecting- the police and fire departments in cities of the first class. The act is referred to as the “Municipal Civil Service Act. ” It is admitted by all parties to this litigation that the city council of Hot Springs by appropriate ordinance established the civil service procedure for the Hot Springs…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Civil Service Comm. of North L.R. v. McDougalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1939
  2. Civil Service Commission of Van Buren v. MatlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1944
  3. Civil Service Commission of Van Buren v. MatlockSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1943
  4. McAllister v. McAllisterSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1940
  5. Allen v. BairdSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1945

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burgess v. Four States Memorial HospitalSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1971
  2. Carter v. ReameySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1960
  3. Connor v. Ricks, MayorSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1948
  4. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993
  5. Opinion No., Arkansas Attorney General Reports1993

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API