Legal Opinion · Dissent

Young v. Young

Court of Appeals of North Carolina

Decided March 15, 2005No. COA04-438Published

1DissentTyson, Judge

I concur with the majority’s opinion to the extent it: (1) affirms the trial court’s order finding plaintiff in willful contempt; (2) affirms the trial court’s decision to order the parties to share information regarding Shaughnessy; and (3) dismisses plaintiff’s argument relating to omissions in the trial court’s order. I disagree with the holding in the majority’s opinion that the provision precluding Lindquist from moving for an increase in Young’s support obligation under certain circumstances for a two-year period to be void. I respectfully dissent.

I. Untimely Anneal

Young argues…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Bailey v. GoodingSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1980
  2. Craver v. CraverSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1979
  3. Harris v. HarrisSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1983
  4. Coburn v. Roanoke Land and Timber CorporationSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1963
  5. Apex Tire and Rubber Co. v. Merritt Tire Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API