Legal Opinion

Taffe v. Warnick

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 28, 1832PublishedCited by 9 opinions

APPEAL from the Clark Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtStevens, J.

An action of trover for a carding machine. Plea not guilty, a jury trial, and a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The Court, on motion of the defendant, charged the jury, “that if they believed,, from the evidence, that the carding machine in question was situated in a building erected for the purpose of carrying on carding, so as to be ready to be put in operation and to do business, although it was in no manner fastened or fixed to the building, except as it stood upon the floor in its usual place of operation, — it was not liable to be levied on and sold as personal property, by…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cited by9 opinions

  1. Capen v. PeckhamSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1868
  2. Thomas v. MeadSupreme Court of Missouri · 1865
  3. Sparks v. State BankIndiana Supreme Court · 1845
  4. Graves v. PierceSupreme Court of Missouri · 1873
  5. Frederick v. DevolIndiana Supreme Court · 1860

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API