Legal Opinion
Eldorado Bank v. Lytle
Appellate Division of the Superior Court of California
Decided July 20, 1983No. Ciiv. A. No. 407PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
ROUSE, J.
The issue decided in this appeal is whether the Rees-Levering Act, actually, the Rees-Levering Automobile Sales Finance Act, hereinafter referred to as the Rees-Levering Act (Civ. Code, § 2983.2, subd. (a)), applies to the sale of the motor home involved in this case.
We also decide whether respondents’ failure to include attorney fees on their cost bill precludes recovery of such fees. We affirm the judgment. Our reasons follow.
Facts
In June of 1977, the respondents Lytle were interested in purchasing a motor home. To this end they proceeded to Tri-county Checker Sales. Mr.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Hernandez v. Atlantic Finance Co. of Los AngelesCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1980
- Mabee v. Nurseryland Garden Centers, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1979
- Clark Equipment Co. v. Mastelotto, Inc.California Court of Appeal · 1978
- Moulin Electric Corp. v. RoachCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1981
3Cited by1 opinion
- Security Pacific National Bank v. CasavantCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1988